Elizabethan sailing ship crossing the Atlantic over an early maritime map showing routes between England and North America.

English Expansionism: From the British Isles to the Atlantic Empire

  1. The Reformation in the British Isles: Causes and Legacy
  2. English Expansionism: From the British Isles to the Atlantic Empire
  3. The Glorious Revolution of 1688: Causes and Legacy
  4. The American Colonies: Religion, Politics and Self-Government
  5. USA: Birth of a Nation — From Independence to the Constitution

English expansionism began within the British Isles before developing into an Atlantic and global imperial system. Military conquest, religious policy, plantations, maritime exploration, chartered companies, settlement, mercantilism and slavery all contributed to this expansion. However, the process was neither continuous nor inevitable, and it produced conquest, resistance and dispossession alongside trade and migration.

What was English expansionism?

English expansionism describes the territorial, commercial and political growth of the English state beyond its original boundaries. It began with attempts to control neighbouring territories within the British Isles. It later extended across the Atlantic, the Caribbean, Africa and Asia through exploration, commerce, settlement and military force.

This process should not be reduced to a single national ambition. Monarchs sought strategic security and greater authority, while merchants pursued markets and profits. Religious communities wanted places to establish their own institutions, and migrants searched for land or employment. Chartered companies, private investors, soldiers, sailors and settlers frequently acted before the Crown possessed either the resources or the intention to govern directly.

Nor were “English” and “British” expansion interchangeable. England and Scotland remained separate kingdoms until the Acts of Union created Great Britain in 1707. Before that date, English overseas projects could compete with Scottish ventures. Afterwards, Scottish merchants, administrators, soldiers and settlers became deeply involved in the expanding British Empire.

Lire English Expansionism: From the British Isles to the Atlantic Empire

The Reformation in the British Isles photo

The Reformation in the British Isles: Causes and Legacy

  1. The Reformation in the British Isles: Causes and Legacy
  2. English Expansionism: From the British Isles to the Atlantic Empire
  3. The Glorious Revolution of 1688: Causes and Legacy
  4. The American Colonies: Religion, Politics and Self-Government
  5. USA: Birth of a Nation — From Independence to the Constitution

The Reformation in the British Isles was not a single religious revolution. England established royal supremacy, Scotland developed a Calvinist Kirk, Wales adopted the English settlement through vernacular translation, while most Irish people remained Catholic. These contrasting reformations reshaped political authority, national identity and the later Atlantic world.

One archipelago, several reformations

The Protestant Reformation began in continental Europe, but it developed differently across England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland. Political institutions, languages, dynastic interests and relations with continental powers shaped each national settlement. The expression “British Reformation” can therefore conceal several distinct and sometimes competing movements.

England’s monarch initiated a jurisdictional break with Rome before the English Church became doctrinally Protestant. Scotland’s reformers challenged both Catholic authority and royal policy, then looked towards Calvinist Geneva. In Ireland, the Crown established a reformed church without converting most of the population. Wales followed the English institutional settlement, although the translation of scripture into Welsh gave its Reformation a distinctive linguistic legacy.

Here, “British Isles” serves as a geographical expression covering Great Britain and Ireland. It does not suggest that the four nations shared one political or religious identity during the sixteenth century.

Lire The Reformation in the British Isles: Causes and Legacy

Etat-Providence et cohésion sociale photo

Etat-Providence et cohésion sociale

I – Etat-Providence : Etat de bien être

Au sens strict, l’Etat-Providence est l’intervention de l’Etat dans le domaine social par l’intermédiaire du système de la sécurité sociale (créée en 1945), lequel vise à garantir un revenu aux personnes touchées par certains riques sociaux : vieillesse, maladie, chômage, accidents du travail, maternité…

Au sens large, l’Etat-Providence représente les interventions économiques et sociales de l’Etat. Les allocations sociales sont apparues dès la fin du 19ème siècle en Allemagne avec Bismarck et concernaient les accidents du travail et le capital vieillesse.

En 1942 paraît le Rapport Beveridge (Beveridge Report) qui crée l’Etat Providence (Welfare State). Cette forme de l’action sociale de l’Etat est devenue primordiale pour la cohésion sociale.

L’Etat-Providence a contribué à l’intégation des individus dans la société pendant les 30 Glorieuses (revenus de transfert). L’Etat-Providence distribue des revenus et relie les individus entre eux : création de solidarité.

II – La citoyenneté sociale

Avec le développement de la protection sociale, la solidarité cesse d’être exclusivement une affaire de famille ou de village pour devenir une affaire nationale.

Les individus bénéficient des mêmes droits sociaux, d’où la naissance de la citoyenneté sociale, qui complète la citoyenneté politique et la citoyenneté civile. Cela favorise le sentiment d’appartenir à une communauté nationale.

III – La redistribution

Est la fonction essentielle de l’Etat-Providence. La politique de redistribution est une politique économique et sociale qui consiste à prélever des impôts et des cotisations sur les revenus primaires (salaires, loyers, bénéfices) et à en redistribuer une partie sous forme de revenus de transferts.

Toute redistribution n’est pas réductrice d’inégalités :

– la redistribution horizontale cherche à maintenir les ressources des individus atteints par des risques sociaux (ex : frais de maladie remboursés pareil pour toutes les PCS). La redistribution horizontale ne réduit pas les inégalités entre riches et pauvres.

la redistribution verticale consiste à transférer les richesses des plus aisés vers les plus pauvres (l’ISF finance le RMI par exemple).

Lire Etat-Providence et cohésion sociale